- 268. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
, 2006
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Aug;50(2):258-65 - 267. Tumour features in the control and screening arm of a randomized trial of prostate cancer.
, 2006
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Jul;50(1):70-5 - 266. Omtrent de equimolariteit van prostaat-specifiek antigeen.
, 2005
Journal: NVKC
Reference: 30: 42-48 - 265. Can PSA density be used to detect prostate cancer?
, 2006
Journal: Nat Clin Pract Urol
Reference: 3(3):130-131 - 264. Biochemical progression rates in the screen arm compared to the control arm of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
, 2006
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 66(10): 1076-81 - 263. Array-based genomic analysis of screen-detected Gleason score 6 and 7 prostatic adenocarcinomas.
, 2006
Journal: Anticancer research
Reference: Mar-Apr;26(2A):1193-200. - 262. Detection rates of high-grade prostate cancer during subsequent screening visits. Results of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer
, 2006
Journal: Int J cancer
Reference: 118, 2538–2542 - 261. Prevalence, Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Familial Prostate Cancer in a Screened Population
, 2006
Journal: J Urol
Reference: 175:1332-1336 - 260. Words of wisdom: Comment on Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in the United States: Implications of Various Definitions for Abnormal.
, 2006
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 49(2): 412-413 - 259. Words of Wisdom: Comment on Incidence and Follow-Up of Patients with Focal Prostate Carcinoma in 2 screening Rounds After an Interval of 4 Years
, 2006
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 49(2):411 - 258. Does PSA velocity predict prostate cancer in pre-screened populations?
, 2006
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 49(3):460-465 - 257. A Comparison of First and Repeat (Four Years Later)Prostate Cancer Screening in a Randomized Cohort of a Symptomatic Men Aged 55-75 Years Using a Biopsy Indication of 3.0 ng/ml (Results of ERSPC,Rotterdam)
, 2006
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 66(6):604-612 - 256. Screening for Prostate Cancer Without Digital Rectal Examination and Transrectal Ultrasound: Results After Four Years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC),Rotterdam
, 2006
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 66(6):625-631 - 255. Prostate cancer: risks and benefits of screening
, 2006
Journal: Nature Clin practice
Reference: Vol 3 no.1: 4-5 - 254. Prostate cancer diagnosis: The impact on patients’ mental health
, 2006
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: Jan;42(2):165-70. - 253. Individualized Screening Interval for Prostate Cancer Based on Prostate-Specific Antigen Level
, 2005
Journal: Arch. Intern Med.
Reference: 165:1857-1861 - 252. Features of prostate cancers detected during a prevalence screening round. The Rotterdam experience.
, 2005
Journal: Can J Urol
Reference: Jun;12 Suppl 2:16-20 - 251. Assessment of Intra-Individual Variation in Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in a Biennial Randomized Prostate Cancer Screening Program in Sweden
, 2005
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 9999 - 250. 4-Year Prostate Specific Antigen Progression and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Ccancer, Rotterdam
, 2005
Journal: J Urol
Reference: 174:489-494 - 249. Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam
, 2005
Journal: J Urol
Reference: 174(1): 121-125 - 248. Rotterdam Randomized Pilot Studies of Screening for Prostate Cancer — An Overview After 10 Years
, 2005
Journal: JNCI
Reference: 97(9): 696 - 247. “Additional use of [-2] precursor prostate specific antigen and “”benign”” PSA at diagnosis in screen-detected prostate cancer”
, 2005
Journal: Urology
Reference: 65:926-930 - 246. Atrophy in prostate needle biopsy cores and its relationship to prostate cancer incidence in screened men
, 2005
Journal: Urology
Reference: 65: 745-749 - 245. Is additional testing necessarry in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/ml or less in a population based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam)
, 2005
Journal: Urology
Reference: 65(2):343-346 - 244. Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
, 2005
Journal: Can J Urol
Reference: 12(1): 2463-2467 - 243. Screening for prostate cancer.
, 2005
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 41:825-833 - 242. Prostate carcinoma detection and increased prostate-specific antigen levels after 4 years in Dutch and Japanese males who had no evidence of disease at initial screening.
, 2005
Journal: Cancer
Reference: Jan 15;103(2):242-50 - 241. Determining overdiagnosis by screening with DRE/TRUS or PSA (Florence pilot studies, 1991-1994).
, 2005
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 41: 411-415 - 240. Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years.
, 2005
Journal: Cancer
Reference: 103 (4): 708-716 - 239. Prevalence and characteristics of screen-detected prostate carcinomas at low prostate-specific antigen levels: aggressive or insignificant?
, 2005
Journal: BJUI
Reference: 95: 231-237 - 238. Association of human papillomavirus with prostate cancer: analysis of a consecutive series of prostate biopsies.
, 2004
Journal: Int. J. Biol Markers
Reference: 19(4):257-61 - 237. Population based screening for prostate cancer:the pathology of early detected tumors. Part I. (Dutch with english summary)
, 2004
Journal: NTvU
Reference: Nov;4 - 236. Watchful waiting versus expectant management at prostatic carcinoma (Dutch with english summary)
, 2004
Journal: NTvU
Reference: Nov;4 - 235. Prostate cancer characteristics and prostate specific antigen changes in screening detected patients initially treated with a watchful waiting policy.
, 2004
Journal: J Urol
Reference: Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2193-6 - 234. Low all-cause mortality in the volunteer-based Rotterdam section of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer: self-selection bias?
, 2004
Journal: J Mec Screen
Reference: 11(2):89-92 - 233. Biopsy technique and biopsy schemes for a first series of prostatic biopsies
, 2004
Journal: Prog Urol.
Reference: 14(2):144-53 - 232. Predictors of random sextant biopsy outcome in screened men with PSA > 4 ng/mL and a negative sextant biopsy at previous screening. Experience in a population-based screening program in Florence.
, 2004
Journal: Int J Biol Markers
Reference: 19(2):89-92 - 231. Detection characteristics in randomized prostate screening
, 2004
Journal: Clin Can Res
Reference: 10:5641-5642 - 230. Prostate volume ultrasonography: the influence of transabdominal versus transrectal approach, device type and operator
, 2004
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 46:352-356 - 229. Circulating free insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, Total IGF-I, and IGF binding protein-3 levels do not predict the future risk to develop prostate cancer: results of a case-control study involving 201 patients within a population based screening with a 4-year interval
, 2004
Journal: J Clin Endocr & meta
Reference: 89(9):4391-4396 - 228. Prostate cancer detection in the prostate specific antigen range of 2.0 – 3.9 ng/ml, value of percent free PSA on tumor detection and tumor aggressiveness
, 2004
Journal: J Urol
Reference: 171:2245-2249 - 227. Second round results of the Finnish population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
, 2004
Journal: Clin cancer Res
Reference: 10:2231-2236 - 226. Lesions predictive for prostate cancer in a screened population: first and second screening round findings
, 2004
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 61:260-266 - 225. Screening for prostate cancer: Results of a prospective trial in Canton Aargau, Switzerland.
, 2004
Journal: Swiss Med Wkly
Reference: 134:580-585 - 224. Free to total PSA ratio is not a reliable predictor of prostate biopsy outcome.
, 2004
Journal: Tumori
Reference: May-Jun;90(3):324-7 - 223. De rol van familiaire prostaatkanker bij vroegopsporing. Resultaten van het nederlandse deel van de ERSPC
, 2004
Journal: IKR bulletin
Reference: Jan: 42-44 - 222. Leadtime associated with screening for prostate cancer
, 2004
Journal: Int. J. Cancer
Reference: 108:122-129 - 221. Prostate cancer detection and tumor characteristics in men with multiple biopsy sessions
, 2004
Journal: Pros. Cancer and Pros. Dis
Reference: 14-08-03 - 220. Test sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen in the Finnish randomised prostate cancer screening trial
, 2004
Journal: Int. J Cancer
Reference: 111:940-943 - 219. Prostate Cancer Detection is Also Relevant in LowProstate Specific Antigen Ranges
, 2004
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 45:155–159