- 378. PSA 1960 – 2010: een bijzondere periode ( in Dutch)
, 2009
Journal: Ned Tijdschr Klin Chem Labgeneesk
Reference: 34: 168-173 - 377. de Koning HJ, Hugosson J, Auvinen A. Prostate Cancer Mortality Reduction by Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening Adjusted for Nonattendance and Contamination in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Oct;56(4):584-91 - 376. Prostate cancer incidence among finasteride and alpha-blocker users in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
, 2009
Journal: Br J Cancer
Reference: 14-08-04 - 375. Test sensitivity in the European prostate cancer screening trial: results from Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands.
, 2009
Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Reference: Jul;18(7):2000-5 - 374. Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer.
, 2009
Journal: Cancer
Reference: 1;115(17):3868-78 - 373. Disease insight and treatment perception of men on active surveillance for early prostate cancer.
, 2010
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Feb;105(3):322-8 - 372. Predictive models in diagnosing indolent cancer.
, 2009
Journal: Cancer
Reference: Jul 1;115(13 Suppl):3100-6 - 371. Words of wisdom. Re: Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening Trial.
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Jun;55(6):1481-2 - 370. Screening for prostate cancer appears to work, but at what cost?
, 2009
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Aug;104(3):290-2 - 369. Prostate cancer: To screen or not to screen?
, 2009
Journal: Nat Rev Urol
Reference: Jun;6(6):299-301 - 368. Screening:should more biopsies be taken in larger prostates?
, 2009
Journal: BJUI
Reference: May 18 - 367. Defining the optimal prostate-specific antigen threshold for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
, 2009
Journal: Curr Opin Urol
Reference: May;19(3):227-31 - 366. Is prostate-specific antigen velocity selective for clinically significant prostate cancer in screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam)
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Feb;55(2):385-92 - 365. Results and participation factors to the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with Prostate Specific Antigen: French departments of Tarn and Hérault
, 2009
Journal: Prog Urol
Reference: Jul;19(7):487-98 - 364. Lead Time and Overdiagnosis in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Importance of Methods and Context
, 2009
Journal: JNCI
Reference: 101: 374 – 383 - 363. Transcript of round table discussion on ERSPC and PLCO trial published in NEJM , March 26 2009
, 2009
Journal: NEJM
Reference: March 26 - 362. Screening for prostate cancer–the controversy that refuses to die.
, 2009
Journal: NEJM
Reference: Mar 26;360(13):1351-4 - 361. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.
, 2009
Journal: NEJM
Reference: Mar 26;360(13):1310-9 - 360. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.
, 2009
Journal: NEJM
Reference: Mar 26;360(13):1320-8 - 359. Non-prostatic pathology on prostate needle-biopsy – colorectal carcinoid: a case report.
, 2009
Journal: Cases J
Reference: Jan 21;2(1):75. - 358. Erectile dysfunction and mental health in a general population of older men.
, 2009
Journal: J Sex Medicine
Reference: Feb;6(2):505-12 - 357. Gleason score 7 screen-detected prostate cancers initially managed expectantly: outcomes in 50 men.
, 2009
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Jun;103(11):1472-7 - 356. Re: Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial.
, 2009
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Jan;103(2):143-4 - 355. Defining increased future risk for prostate cancer: evidence from a population based screening cohort.
, 2009
Journal: J Urol
Reference: Jan;181(1):69-74 - 354. Biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer in the Finnish screening trial.
, 2009
Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: 1;124(3):547-52. - 352. Clinical Impact of New Prostate-Specific Antigen WHO Standardization on Biopsy Rates and Cancer Detection.
, 2008
Journal: Clin Chem
Reference: 54(12):1999-2006 - 351. Predictive Modeling in Prostate Cancer: A Conference Summary.
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Feb;55(2):300-2 - 350. A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.
, 2008
Journal: BMC Med
Reference: Jul 8;6:19 - 348. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators indicating a positive prostate biopsy: a comparison.
, 2008
Journal: BJU Int
Reference: 102(9):1068-73 - 347. Ki-67 in screen-detected, low-grade, low-stage prostate cancer, relation to prostate-specific antigen doubling time, Gleason score and prostate- specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy.
, 2008
Journal: Scand J Urol Nephrol.
Reference: Oct 23:1-7 - 346. A graphical device to represent the outcomes of a logistic regression analysis.
, 2008
Journal: Prostate
Reference: 68(15):1674-80. - 345. Is There Evidence of a Relationship between Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer? Findings of a Literature Review.
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Apr;55(4):864-73. - 344. Reply from Authors re: Peter C. Albertsen. The Treatment Paradigm Shifts Again on Prostate Cancer.
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: xx-xx - 343. Outcomes of Men with Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance Who Were Managed Expectantly.
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: xx-xx - 342. Screening for prostate cancer (PC)–an update on recent findings of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
, 2008
Journal: Urol Oncol
Reference: 26(5):533-41 - 341. PSA use and incidence of prostate biopsy in the Tuscany region: is opportunistic screening discounting biopsy in subjects with PSA elevation?
, 2008
Journal: Tumori
Reference: 94(4):518-22 - 340. PSA doubling time as a predictor of the outcome of random prostate biopsies prompted by isolated PSA elevation in subjects referred to an outpatient biopsy facility in a routine clinical scenario.
, 2008
Journal: Int J Biomarkers
Reference: 23(3):187-91 - 339. “Does “”normal”” aging imply urinary, bowel, and erectile dysfunction? A general population survey.”
, 2008
Journal: Urology
Reference: Jul;72(1):3-9 - 338. Validation of pretreatment nomograms for predicting indolent prostate cancer: efficacy in contemporary urological practice.
, 2008
Journal: J urol
Reference: 180(1):150-4 - 337. Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics in Clinical Decision-Making During Active Surveillance for Early Prostate Cancer—A Review
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 54(3):505-516 - 336. The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.
, 2008
Journal: Prostate
Reference: Jun 15;68(9):985-93 - 335. Editorial comment on:The Role of the Digital Rectal Examination in Subsequent Screening Visits in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam: Digital Rectal Examination Remains an Important Screening Tool for Prostate Cancer
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 54(3):483-484 - 334. The Role of the Digital Rectal Examination in Subsequent Screening Visits in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 54(3):581-588 - 333. Editorial comment on: Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer—a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC),
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 55.(1): 139-147, - 332. Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer-a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 55.91):139-147 - 331. Reply from Authors re: Martha K. Terris. Editorial Comment on: Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Selective for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer In Screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam).
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 2009 Feb;55(2):393 - 330. Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Selective for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam).
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 2009 Feb;55(2):385-92 - 329. Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer
, 2008
Journal: World J Urol
Reference: 26(5):423-429 - 328. Words of wisdom:(II) Re: Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity in Men with Total Prostate Specific Antigen Less than 4 ng/ml
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 53: 854-855 - 327. Words of wisdom: (I) Re: Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity in Men with Total Prostate Specific Antigen Less than 4 ng/ml
, 2008
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 53: 852–854