- 428. Interval cancers in the Antwerp European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer study, using a 6 year screening interval
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3090-3094. - 427. Change of tumour characteristics and treatment over time in both arms of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3082-3089. - 426. Deciding on PSA-screening – Quality of current consumer information on the Internet
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3073-3081. - 425. Detection rates of cancer, high grade PIN and atypical lesions suspicious for cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3068-3072. - 424. Blinded and uniform causes of death verification in cancer screening: A major influence on the outcome of a prostate cancer screening trial?
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3061-3067. - 423. PSA levels and cancer detection rate by centre in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46(2010):3053-3060. - 422. Prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends in 37 European countries: An overview
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46 (2010):3040-3052 - 421. Foreword: Meeting the challenge of prostate cancer
, 2010
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 46 (2010):3037-3039. - 420. Reply to David Connolly, Rachel Hutton, Patrick F. Keane’s Letter to the Editor re: Monique J. Roobol, Fritz H. Schröder, Pim van Leeuwen, et al. Performance of the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) Gene and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prescreened Men: Exploring the Value of PCA3 for a First-line Diagnostic Test.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 14-12-07 - 419. Is Prostate Cancer Screening Bad or Good? Summary of a Debate at the Innovation in Urology Meeting, September 17-19, 2010, Milan, Italy.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Oct 26 - 418. No excess mortality after prostate biopsy: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
, 2011
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Jun;107(12):1912-7. - 417. Performance of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prescreened Men: Reproducibility and Detection Characteristics for Prostate Cancer Patients with High PCA3 Scores (>=100).
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 58(2010):893-98. - 416. Balancing the harms and benefits of early detection of prostate cancer.
, 2010
Journal: Cancer
Reference: 15;116(20):4857-65. - 415. The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.
, 2010
Journal: Clin Cancer Reserach
Reference: Sep 1;16(17):4374-81 - 414. Words of wisdom. Re: Estimating the benefits of PSA screening.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Jan;57(1):175-6 - 413. Prostate-specific antigen screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-Rotterdam.
, 2010
Journal: JNCI
Reference: Mar 3;102(5):352-5 - 412. The implementation of screening for prostate cancer.
, 2010
Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis.
Reference: Sep;13(3):218-27. - 411. Risk factors: Increased risk of suicide after prostate cancer diagnosis.
, 2010
Journal: Nat Rev Urol
Reference: Jul;7(7):369-70. - 410. Why do men opt out of prostate-cancer screening? Attitudes and perception among participants and non-participants of a screening trial.
, 2010
Journal: BJUI
Reference: Aug;106(4):472-7. - 409. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Isoform p2PSA in Combination with Total PSA and Free PSA Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 57(6):921-7 - 408. A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
, 2010
Journal: Br J cancer
Reference: 103(5):708-14 - 407. Should prostate-specific antigen screening be offered to asymptomatic men?
, 2010
Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther.
Reference: Jul;10(7):1043-53. - 406. Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity Does Not Aid Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Prior Negative Biopsy.
, 2010
Journal: J Urol
Reference: Sep;184(3):907-912. - 405. Reply from Authors re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Giacomo Novara, Filiberto Zattoni, The role of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) test for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the era of opportunistic prostate-specific antigen screening.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Oct;58(4):481. - 404. The Role of the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3(PCA3)Test for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Opportunistic Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Oct;58(4):475-81. - 403. Performance of the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) Gene and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prescreened Men: Exploring the Value of PCA3 for a First-line Diagnostic Test.
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 58(4):475-81. - 402. Screening for prostate cancer: have we resolved the controversy?
, 2010
Journal: Curr Opin Support Palliat Care.
Reference: Sep;4(3):121-6. - 401. The REDUCE trial
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 58(2):253-5 - 400. Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.
, 2010
Journal: JCO
Reference: May 20;28(15):2493-8 - 399. A four-kallikrein panel predicts prostate cancer in men with recent screening: data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam.
, 2010
Journal: Clin Cancer Research
Reference: Jun 15;16(12):3232-9 - 398. Results of the three rounds of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial – the incidence of advanced cancer is decreased by screening
, 2010
Journal: Int J cancer
Reference: 27(7):1699-705 - 397. Effect of the correction for non-compliance and contamination on the estimated reduction of metastatic prostate cancer within a randomized screening trial (ERSPC section rotterdam).
, 2010
Journal: Int J cancer
Reference: 127(11):2639-44 - 396. Prostate cancer incidence rates have started to decrease in central Italy
, 2010
Journal: J Med Screening
Reference: 17:50–51 - 395. ERSPC and PLCO Prostate Cancer Screening Studies: What Are the Differences?
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Jul;58(1):46-52 - 394. Risk of dying from prostate cancer in men randomized to screening: differences between attendees and nonattendees.
, 2009
Journal: Cancer
Reference: 15;115(24):5672-9. - 393. False-positive screening results in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
, 2010
Journal: Br J Cancer
Reference: Feb 2;102(3):469-74 - 392. Prostate cancer and PSA among statin users in the finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
, 2010
Journal: Int J cancer
Reference: Oct 1;127(7):1650-9 - 391. PSA screening – a review of recent studies
, 2009
Journal: Eur J Cancer
Reference: 45 Suppl 1:402-4 - 390. Is Delayed Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Low-Risk Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer Associated With a Higher Risk of Unfavorable Outcomes?
, 2010
Journal: Cancer
Reference: Mar 1;116(5):1281-90 - 389. Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: An evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator
, 2010
Journal: EJC
Reference: 46:669-677 - 388. Oomens EHGM, Rannikko A, Roemeling S, Steyerberg EW, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Bangma CH Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre ‘Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance’ study
, 2009
Journal: BJUI
Reference: 14-01-07 - 387. Prostate cancer mortality in screen and clinically detected prostate cancer: Estimating the screening benefit
, 2010
Journal: EJC
Reference: 3 7 7 –3 8 3 - 386. Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer
, 2009
Journal: BJC
Reference: 101, 1833 – 1838 - 385. False-negative Prostate Needle Biopsies: Frequency, Histopathologic Features, and Follow-up
, 2010
Journal: Am J Surg Pathol
Reference: 34:35–43 - 384. Eleven-Year Outcome of Patients with Prostate Cancers Diagnosed During Screening After Initial Negative Sextant Biopsies
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 57(2):256-66 - 383. A Risk-Based Strategy Improves Prostate-Specific Antigen–Driven Detection of Prostate Cancer
, 2010
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 57:79-85 - 382. Should Pathologists Routinely Report Prostate Tumour Volume? The Prognostic Value of Tumour Volume in Prostate Cancer
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: XX-XX - 381. Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Result from a Large, Representative, Population-based Cohort
, 2009
Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 56: 753-760 - 380. The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC
, 2010
Journal: Int J cancer
Reference: january - 379. A Framework for the Identification of Men at Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer
, 2009
Journal: J Urol
Reference: Vol. 182, 2112-2122