- 620. Correction: Absolute Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening: Balance of Benefits and Harms by Center within the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.
2016
,Journal: Clin Cancer Res
Reference: Jul 15;22(14):3702 - 619. Statin Use and Prostate Cancer Survival in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
2016
,Journal: Eur Urol Focus
Reference: June 2. - 618. Warfarin use and prostate cancer risk in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
2016
,Journal: Scand J Urol
Reference: Sep 14:1-7 - 617. Estimating bias in causes of death ascertainment in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
2016
,Journal: Cancer Epidemiol
Reference: Sep 13;45:1-5 - 616. Prostate cancer risk among users of digoxin and other antiarrhythmic drugs in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2016
,Journal: Cancer Causes Control
Reference: Feb;27(2):157-64 - 615. A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data Reveals an Association between Circulating Levels of IGF-I and Prostate Cancer Risk.
2016
,Journal: Cancer Res
Reference: Apr 15;76(8):2288-300 - 614. Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.
2016
,Journal: Mod Pathol
Reference: Jun;29(6):630-6 - 613. Where we are with screening and risk prediction for prostate cancer in 2016.
2016
,Journal: BJU Int
Reference: Mar;117(3):381 - 612. Perspective: Enforce the clinical guidelines.
2015
,Journal: Nature
Reference: Dec 17;528(7582):S123 - 611. Prostate Specific Antigen as a Tumor Marker in Prostate Cancer: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects.
2015
,Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol
Reference: 867:93-114 - 610. Unorganized prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: more harm than benefit. When will we finally start to implement guidelines and risk assessment tools in clinical practice?
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Sep;68(3):363-4 - 609. Do Treatment Differences between Arms Affect the Main Outcome of ERSPC Rotterdam?
2015
,Journal: J Urol
Reference: Aug;194(2):336-42 - 608. Ethnicity and prostate cancer: the way to solve the screening problem?
2015
,Journal: BMC Med
Reference: Aug 4;13:179 - 607. [Early detection of prostate cancer–recommendations after 13 years of follow-up in the European randomised study].
2015
,Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
Reference: 159:A8677 - 606. Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Past and future.
2015
,Journal: Int J Urol
Reference: Jun;22(6):524-32 - 605. Digital rectal examination can detect early prostate cancer.
2015
,Journal: Evid Based Med
Reference: Jun;20(3):119 - 604. Correlation between stage shift and differences in mortality in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
2016
,Journal: BJU Int
Reference: Apr 22. - 604. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: developments to date.
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol.
Reference: Apr;67(4):646-8 - 603. Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2016
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Nov;70(5):760-766 - 602. Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study.
2016
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Jan;71(1):46-52 - 601. Number of screening rounds and post-screening prostate cancer incidence: Results from the Finnish section of ERSPC study.
2016
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Sep;70(3):499-505 - 600. Absolute Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening: Balance of Benefits and Harms by Center within the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.
2016
,Journal: Clin Cancer Res
Reference: Jan 1;22(1):243-9 - 599. Prostate cancer and socioeconomic status in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
2016
,Journal: Am J Epidemiol 2016
Reference: In press - 598. Prostate cancer: Is prostatectomy for Gleason score 6 a treatment failure?
2015
,Journal: Nat Rev Urol.
Reference: Jan;12(1):10-1 - 597. Postscreening follow-up of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial on putative prostate cancer risk factors: vitamin and mineral use, male pattern baldness, pubertal development and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.
2016
,Journal: Scan J Urol
Reference: 29:1-7 - 596. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer death in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2016
,Journal: PLoS One
Reference: 11(4):e0153413 - 595. Sotalol, but not digoxin is associated with decreased prostate cancer risk. A population-based case-control study.
2015
,Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: 137(5):1187-95 - 594. Prostate cancer risk among users of digoxin and other antiarrhythmic drugs in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2016
,Journal: Cancer Causes Control
Reference: 27(2):157-64. - 593. The Finnish prostate cancer screening trial: analyses on the screening failures.
2015
,Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: 136(10):2437-43 - 592. 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use and prostate cancer survival in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2016
,Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: 138(12):2820-8 - 591. Polymorphisms of Genes Involved in Glucose and Energy Metabolic Pathways and Prostate Cancer: Interplay with Metformin.
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 68(6):1089-97 - 590. The Effect of Start and Stop Age at Screening on the Risk of Being Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer
2016
,Journal: J Urol
Reference: May;195(5):1390-6 - 589. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Goteborg Randomised Screening Trial
2016
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Oct;70(4):566-573 - 588. A positive family history as a risk factor for prostate cancer in a population-based study with organised prostate-specific antigen screening: results of the Swiss European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Aarau).
2016
,Journal: BJU Int.
Reference: Apr;117(4):576-83 - 587. Reducing overdiagnosis by polygenic risk-stratified screening: findings from the Finnish section of the ERSPC.
2015
,Journal: Br J Cancer
Reference: Sep 29;113(7):1086-93 - 586. Differences among men on active surveillance for very low-risk prostate cancer detected through population-based versus opportunistic prostate-specific antigen-screening.
2015
,Journal: Urol Int.
Reference: 94(3):330-6. - 585. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and prostate cancer survival in the finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
2015
,Journal: Prostate
Reference: Sep;75(13):1394-402 - 584. Prostate cancer screening using risk stratification based on a multi-state model of genetic variants.
2015
,Journal: Prostate
Reference: Jun;75(8):825-35. - 583. Ethnicity and prostate cancer: the way to solve the screening problem?
2015
,Journal: BMC Med.
Reference: Aug 4;13:179 - 582. Early detection of prostate cancer–recommendations after 13 years of follow-up in the European randomised study
2015
,Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd.
Reference: 159:A8677. - 581. Rule-based versus probabilistic selection for active surveillance using three definitions of insignificant prostate cancer.
2016
,Journal: World J Urol.
Reference: Feb;34(2):253-60 - 580. Prostate cancer screening in Europe – Authors’ reply.
2015
,Journal: Lancet
Reference: Apr 18;385(9977):1507-8 - 579. Corrigendum to “Incidence of Prostate Cancer After Termination of Screening in a Population-based Randomised Screening Trial” [Eur Urol 2013;64:703-9].
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Aug;68(2):e46. - 578. Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol.
Reference: Nov;68(5):885-90 - 577. Is further screening of men with baseline PSA < 1ng/ml worthwhile? the discussion continues - results of the Swiss ERSPC (Aarau).
2015
,Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: Aug 1;137(3):553-9. - 576. Prostate cancer screening: and yet it moves!
2015
,Journal: Asian J Androl
Reference: May-Jun;17(3):437-8. - 575. The Finnish prostate cancer screening trial: Analyses on the screening failures.
2015
,Journal: Int J Cancer
Reference: May 15;136(10):2437-43. - 574. Opportunistic Testing Versus Organized Prostate-specific Antigen Screening: Outcome After 18 Years in the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Sep;68(3):354-60 - 573. Reply from Authors re: Sigrid V. Carlsson, Peter C. Albertsen. Better Survival After Curative Treatment for Screen-detected Prostate Cancer Compared with Clinical Diagnosis: A Real Effect or Lead-time Bias? Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.035: Better Treatment in the Control Arm of the ERSPC Rotterdam: A Point Worth Noting?
2015
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: 68:183-4 - 572. The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.
2014
,Journal: Eur Urol
Reference: Dec;66(6):1109-15.